The Setter’s Secret: How Gym Climb Grades Emerge

Climbing grades in a climbing gym setting carry significant weight, acting as both a common system for understanding difficulty and a personal measure of progress for many climbers. Many climbers invest emotionally in these numbers, from celebrating personal bests to experiencing frustration. This exploration aims to demystify the intricate process of route setting and grading, essentially explaining how climbing routes are set and how climbing gym grades explained can lead to better experiences. We will delve into how these grades function to help us track progress, set goals, select appropriate challenges, and communicate with other climbers. By unveiling the journey of how a grade is born, from a route setter’s initial concept to the final grading system consensus, we hope to empower you with a deeper appreciation and understanding of this fundamental aspect of indoor climbing.

The Architects of Ascent: Profile of a Modern Route Setter

Route setters are the crucial artisans within the climbing gym ecosystem, shaping the very experience of every climber who walks through the doors. Their role is a dynamic blend of artistry in designing movement, athleticism in testing and demonstrating climbs, and technical knowledge in safety and ergonomics; these are key elements of route setting basics. Becoming a professional setter involves dedication to mastering these diverse skills for setting various climbing routes.

The Multifaceted Role: Artist, Athlete, Engineer

Route setters are much more than just individuals who attach holds to a wall; they are recognized as craftsmen creating the primary product of a climbing facility. Their work, a look behind route setting, is a complex interplay of creativity, physical prowess, and technical understanding, which collectively shapes the entire climbing experience for gym patrons. This makes their contribution fundamental to a gym’s success and the satisfaction of its members.

The artistic element of setting shines through in the creative vision for a climb, the aesthetic arrangement of holds, and the design of movement that is both challenging and enjoyable. Setters endeavor to choreograph sequences offering mental stimulation and physical reward, thereby crafting a distinct “experience” for each climber. Scientifically, setters require a robust grasp of biomechanics, the physics of movement, and critical safety standards concerning hold attachment and wall structures, including aspects of technical climbing. The job is also intensely physical, involving lifting heavy gear, drilling, and, significantly, repeatedly test-climbing routes to refine them, which carries implications for their career longevity and well-being. The Climbing Wall Association offers insights into balancing business creativity and labor in this demanding profession.

Essential Skills and Qualities for Route Setting

Creativity and vision form the foundation, enabling setters to conceptualize unique climbs from a blank wall and a diverse array of holds. This artistic capacity must be paired with deep technical knowledge of climbing techniques and the characteristics of various hold types—jugs, crimps, slopers, pinches, volumes—and how wall angles like slab, vertical, or overhang influence difficulty and climbing style. Significant climbing proficiency is also essential climbing equipment for a setter.

Setters must forerun (test climb) routes, often at or above the grade they are setting, to accurately assess movement, fairness, and overall flow. Forerunning is an analytical process, not merely sending the climb; it’s about feeling the nuances of every move. An unwavering commitment to safety is non-negotiable, involving strict adherence to industry standards for secure hold attachment and designing safe fall zones. Furthermore, setters need empathy and an understanding of how diverse climbers (different body types, strengths, skills) will interact with a route, focusing on the user experience. Teamwork and effective communication are also vital for collaborative setting environments, especially in large climbing gyms. For a closer look at the profession, Coeur Climbing provides a piece on what goes on “behind the holds routesetting.”

Path to Professionalization: Training and Certification

The journey to becoming a route setter often begins with a deep passion for climbing and extensive personal experience on the wall. Many gain their initial skills through informal apprenticeships or mentorship from seasoned setters within their local climbing gym. However, the field is increasingly moving towards formalization through structured training and workshops, reflecting a growing emphasis on standardized practices and safety.

Organizations such as the Climbing Wall Association (CWA) and USA Climbing play a pivotal role in this professionalization by offering certifications, like the CWA Level 1 & 2 or USA Climbing Level 1 & 2. These certifications typically require candidates to demonstrate substantial experience, possess work-at-height training, and meet specific climbing and setting proficiency benchmarks. This trend aims to standardize skills, promote safety, and elevate the overall quality of route setting across the industry. While this maturation may lead to better and safer routes, it could also present higher entry barriers for aspiring setters. Aspiring setters can explore “routesetting clinics for certification” through USA Climbing or look into a “professional routesetting application CWA” for more information.

From Concept to Crux: The Lifecycle of a Gym Climb

The creation of a gym climb is a meticulous journey, transforming a blank gym wall into a defined challenge with specific movements and a target difficulty level. This process unfolds in stages, from initial planning and thoughtful design, through the physical act of building the route, to the critical phase of forerunning, testing, and iteration. Understanding this lifecycle offers insight into how climbing routes are set.

Planning & Design: The Blueprint of a Climb

The birth of a new route commences with defining clear goals and considering the target audience. This aligns with the gym’s objectives and the diverse needs of its climbers, whether they are beginner climbers, intermediate, or advanced. A crucial early decision is establishing the “difficulty intent,” where setters determine the target grade or grade range for the new route. Hold selection is a critical design element; setters choose from an inventory of hold types—jugs, crimps, slopers, pinches, large features known as volumes—based on the target grade, desired movement style, and current availability.

The size, texture (including dual-texture options), and shape of each hold are meticulously considered for their impact on movement, with larger holds and volumes typically placed first to anchor the route. The wall’s existing features and angles—slab, vertical, overhang, arêtes, corners—are integral to the design, fundamentally shaping the climb’s character and difficulty. Setters strive for a natural, engaging “flow” in movement sequences, an element crucial for climber enjoyment, irrespective of their climbing style. Creative inspiration can stem from a multitude of sources, including memorable outdoor climbs, competition videos, the unique shapes of holds, or even the rhythm and mood of music. For those just starting, understanding the “best way for beginner to set routes” can be very insightful.

The Build: Attaching Holds & Shaping Movement

Once the design is conceptualized, setters employ tools like impact drivers, wrenches, ladders or climbing ropes, harnesses, and buckets of holds to physically attach the selected holds to the climbing wall. The orientation and precise placement of each hold are critical; even slight rotations can dramatically alter its usability and, consequently, the route’s difficulty.

Setting approaches can vary: some setters meticulously plan with pre-selected holds, while others adopt a more organic method, allowing the route to evolve on the wall. Regardless of the specific method, it’s an iterative process involving placing a hold, visualizing or testing a move, and then making necessary adjustments to achieve the desired effect. Throughout the entire build phase, strict adherence to safety protocols is paramount to protect both the setter and future climbers on these artificial climbing walls. This includes ensuring holds are securely fastened to prevent spinning or breaking, managing tools safely while at height, and maintaining awareness of the work environment to prevent hazards.

Forerunning & Iteration: The Critical Testing Phase

Forerunning is the crucial stage where a newly set route is climbed to meticulously assess its difficulty, flow, safety, and overall quality; it’s essential for an enjoyable climbing experience. It’s often said that this is where “good routes become great routes”. Both individual forerunning by the primary setter and team forerunning are common practices. Team forerunning is particularly valuable as it provides multiple perspectives, helping to gauge how the route feels to a wider range of climbers with different strengths and body types.

Based on feedback gathered during forerunning, the route undergoes tweaking and refinement. This can involve adjusting hold positions, changing their orientations, swapping holds entirely, or adding/removing small footholds to fine-tune sequences or improve accessibility for more climbers. A key goal is to ensure the intended movement is encouraged and to minimize obvious “cheats” or unintended easier sequences (beta), though well-crafted commercial routes might allow for creative alternative solutions. A primary objective of forerunning is achieving the intended difficulty by comparing the route against benchmarks and other established climbs in the gym. This iterative loop of setting, testing, and adjusting is fundamental to how the final grade emerges. Forerunning is also critical for ensuring fairness and minimizing “morpho” characteristics—where difficulty is highly dependent on a climber’s body shape—by considering climbers of different heights and reaches. Considering “route setting to prevent climbing injury” is also an important aspect of this phase.

The Language of Difficulty: Understanding Gym Grading Systems and Key Factors

To better interpret the challenges presented in a climbing gym, it’s helpful to understand the primary grading systems used—the Yosemite Decimal System (YDS) for roped climbing and the V-Scale for bouldering. We will also detail the multiple factors route setters consider when assigning a final grade to a climb, including the often-used consensus process. Clarifying how grades are determined can empower climbers to make more informed choices about the climbs they attempt.

Overview of YDS and V-Scale in Gyms

The Yosemite Decimal System (YDS) is the standard for roped climbing in gyms across North America. It begins at class 5.0 and currently extends up to 5.15d, with letter subdivisions (a, b, c, d) introduced from grades 5.10 upwards to denote finer increments in difficulty. The “5” signifies technical rock climbs where ropes are typically used. While traditionally the grade was based on the single hardest move (the crux), gym application often considers the sustained difficulty throughout the route. The V-Scale (or Hueco Scale) is the predominant grading system for bouldering in North America, starting with VB (beginner) and progressing numerically from V0 up to V17. It focuses purely on the technical difficulty of the moves required to complete the boulder problem. This makes understanding bouldering grades crucial for selecting appropriate challenges.

While other grade systems like the Fontainebleau (Font) scale are used internationally, YDS and V-Scale are most relevant for North American gyms. Approximate conversions between these different grading system options exist, but they are inherently challenging. This is especially true when attempting to convert between roped climbing grades and bouldering grades, as they measure different types of effort and physical challenges. If you want to dive deeper, Gripped Magazine has an interesting article where they “lets talk about grades.” The original climbing system often has nuances lost in translation.

Key Factors Influencing a Climb’s Grade

The crux difficulty, which refers to the single hardest move or sequence of moves on a route, often forms the primary basis for its grade. Beyond this, Hold characteristics are primary determinants, including their size, type (such as crimps, slopers, or jugs), how positive or incut they are, and their texture. The spacing of holds and the reach required to move between them significantly impact difficulty, potentially necessitating dynamic movements (dynos) and affecting climbers of different heights differently. The angle of the climbing wall—whether it’s a slab, vertical, or steep incline—drastically influences the effort required, body positioning, and the types of holds that can be effectively used. The steepness is a major factor.

The complexity and technicality of the moves also contribute to the technical grade. This includes requirements for specific techniques like heel hooks, flagging for balance, or precise footwork. The grade further reflects whether the difficulty stems from sustained effort on moderately hard moves or from a single, very hard move. Route length can also be a factor, particularly for endurance in roped sport climbs. Some setting teams even employ a “Risk, Intensity, Complexity” (RIC) framework to structure their grading discussions. For a general overview, Wikipedia offers an article on “grade climbing wikipedia.”

The Consensus Process: Grading as a Team Effort

In most professional gym settings, climbing grades emerge from a consensus process that involves the entire route setting team, rather than being decided by a single individual. The setter who initially designed and installed the route typically proposes an initial grade based on their specific intent for the climb and their personal experience during forerunning. This proposal for the proper grade serves as the starting point for discussion.

Following the initial proposal, other members of the setting team will forerun the route. This step is crucial as it brings diverse perspectives from climbers who may have varying styles, strengths, weaknesses, and body types. This collective testing is fundamental for mitigating the initial setter’s personal biases and is an integral part of accurate grade determination. The team then discusses any discrepancies in perceived difficulty, often calibrating the new route against existing benchmark climbs within the gym that have well-established grades. The Head Route Setter often facilitates this discussion and may have the final say to ensure consistency with the gym’s grading philosophy and to ensure a balanced distribution of difficulties for the target audience. Movement Climbing Yoga shares insights into their “movement gyms routesetting process” which often involves such teamwork.

The Subjectivity Factor: Why Grades Are Personal and Variable

Climbing grades, while aiming for a standard, possess an inherent subjectivity, leading to variations in how a grade feels across different gyms or even between routes within the same facility. It’s useful to explore concepts like “sandbagged” (harder than rated) versus “soft” (easier than rated) grades, the influence of a setter’s individual bias, gym-to-gym variations, and the strategies gyms implement to foster consistency. This is central to understanding route setting in climbing gyms: how grades are born.

Inherent Subjectivity and Perceived Inconsistencies

Climbing grading is fundamentally an attempt to apply an objective measure to what is, at its core, a subjective experience; grades are best understood as guidelines, not absolute, unyielding truths. The determination of a grade, whether for an indoor gym climb or an outdoor rock climbing face (which could be free climbed or involve aid climbing), is made by humans and is thus influenced by personal experience, individual perception of effort, and inherent biases.

Climbers often use colloquial terms like “sandbagged” to describe a route that feels significantly harder than its assigned grade, and “soft” for one that feels easier. These perceptions of inconsistency can arise from various factors, including miscalibration during the setting process, differing setting styles among various setters, distinct grading philosophies held by different gyms, or even local grading variations in how grades are interpreted and applied. The ongoing debate about “soft vs. stiff” grading reflects differing viewpoints on what best motivates climbers and the ultimate purpose of gym grades, a conversation that can also carry business implications for climbing facilities. Long Beach Rising has a blog post that discusses the “subjectivity of rock climbing grades.”

Setter’s Bias and the “Morpho” Challenge

“Setter’s bias” describes how a route setter’s individual strengths, weaknesses, preferred climbing style, and even physical attributes (such as height, arm span) can unintentionally influence the routes they create and the perceived difficulty of those routes. For instance, a particularly tall setter might unknowingly create moves that are disproportionately difficult for shorter climbers, or a setter who excels at crimpy holds might underestimate the difficulty of a crimp-intensive route for others who don’t share that specific strength.

This often leads to the creation of “morpho” routes, where the difficulty is highly dependent on a climber’s morphology—their specific body shape and size. The “Grading Bias Problem” highlights the inherent challenge setters face in creating objectively graded routes for diverse climbers despite the inherent subjectivity of creation. Gyms attempt to mitigate this through comprehensive team forerunning, consensus-based grading discussions, actively encouraging setters to be aware of their biases, and striving for a variety of climbing styles at each grade level. While research into machine learning and AI for grade standardization is an emerging field, it is unlikely to fully replace the nuanced human element of route setting. For an academic perspective, PMC NCBI offers a research paper on “addressing grading bias in rock climbing.”

Gym-to-Gym Variations and Indoor vs. Outdoor Gap

Climbers frequently discover that grades can feel noticeably different from one gym to another, and these variations can be even more pronounced when comparing gyms across different regions. Each climbing gym tends to develop its own grading “feel” or philosophy over time, sometimes leading to a new gym having own gradings that feel different. A well-documented phenomenon is the “indoor vs. outdoor grading gap.” This refers to the common perception that indoor climbs, especially at lower to intermediate grades, are often softer—meaning easier—than outdoor climbs (like traditional climbing routes or sport climbs) of the ostensibly same grade. This can sometimes lead to a bit of a shock for gym-bred climbers when they first venture outdoors to a new climbing area.

Several reasons contribute to this gap. The controlled gym environment features predictable, often brand-new or very clean holds, and clearly marked paths, which contrasts with the weathered, less obvious, and often more complex nature of outdoor rock. Gyms also cater to a broader audience, including many beginner climbers, making easier grades more achievable, which can be encouraging and help build confidence. Business incentives can also play a role; attainable grades may boost climber confidence and enjoyment, potentially leading to better member retention and a more positive customer experience. Common Climber offers some “grading climbs at the gym insights.”

Strategies for Consistency and Transparency in Gym Grading

Gyms employ team setting and consensus grading as primary strategies to average out individual setter biases and achieve more consistent grades across their walls. Some facilities utilize benchmark climbs—routes with widely agreed-upon grades—or standardized training boards like MoonBoards or Kilter Boards, which have global boulder problem databases, as internal calibration tools for their setters. This personal grade calibration helps maintain a degree of uniformity.

Circuit grading, which uses color-coded ranges (e.g., “Yellow Circuit: V2-V4”) instead of assigning precise single grades to each climb, pragmatically acknowledges the inherent subjectivity in grading. This approach can be less intimidating for climbers and allows for a greater variety of styles and intensities within a single band or sub-grade. Progressive gyms actively solicit climber feedback through informal conversations, physical feedback boards, or digital platforms like KAYA, Stokt, or Retro Flash. On these apps, climbers can log their ascents and suggest grades, providing valuable crowdsourced data that helps setters gauge community perception and can introduce more data-driven insights into the grading process. Clear communication about setting schedules and the gym’s grading philosophy also helps manage climber expectations. The use of “standardized boards and grading apps” is becoming more common.

A Practical Guide: What to Expect at Common Gym Grades

To help navigate the climbing gym landscape, here’s a general overview of the characteristics one might encounter at common Bouldering Grades (VB-V5) in the Gym and Roped Climbing Grades (5.6-5.11d) in the Gym. It is important to remember that these descriptions are rough guides, as variability in setting styles and gym philosophies can lead to differences in how these grades feel. Understanding what bouldering grades are defined as the difficulty of a boulder problem can be very helpful.

Bouldering Grades (VB-V5) in the Gym

VB – V1 boulder problems generally feature larger, positive holds like jugs and substantial edges, often with straightforward, “ladder-like” movements. These initial bouldering grades (or V-grades) focus on teaching basic climbing techniques and building foundational strength and confidence on the bouldering wall. Dynamic movement, if present, is typically rare or involves simple lunges to large, obvious targets. These climbs are designed to be accessible and encouraging for newcomers. Often, V-grades start here for many gyms.

V2 – V3 boulder problems begin to introduce smaller edges, often referred to as crimps, and less positive slopers that require more nuanced body positioning. Climbers will also encounter more varied pinches at these grades, all demanding an increase in finger strength. These grades necessitate greater technical skill, precise body positioning, basic dynamic moves, and more critical footwork. This grade range often marks a point where technique starts to become more significant than relying on pure strength alone for success. You might see a grade V or a grade IV in outdoor contexts correspond roughly, but gym V-Scale is specific.

V4 – V5 boulder problems typically feature small crimps, challenging slopers especially on a steep section or steep incline, difficult pinches, and potentially fewer or smaller footholds, demanding significant finger strength and precise placement. Movements often involve complex sequences requiring strong core tension, power, and more committing dynos. Good route-reading skills become increasingly important at these grades, which often feel “powerful” and represent a solid benchmark for dedicated climbers and even some weekend climbers. Philadelphia Rock Gyms offer a resource for “understanding climbing grades bouldering.” An additional grade like V5+ might denote a harder V5.

Roped Climbing Grades (5.6-5.11d) in the Gym

5.6 – 5.8 routes are characterized by large, plentiful, and positive handholds and footholds. These climbs are typically found on low-angle to vertical terrain, making them feel secure. The movements are generally straightforward and intuitive, well-suited for beginner climbers who are learning fundamental movement skills, becoming comfortable with height, and developing initial endurance on longer routes. These YDS grades are foundational.

5.9 – 5.10d routes introduce smaller, less positive holds, with good holds often spaced further apart. The terrain at these grades is frequently vertical, and some routes may begin to incorporate slight overhangs. Climbing in this range demands more specific skills, better footwork, thoughtful body positioning, and more deliberate sequence planning. The 5.10 grade also introduces letter subdivisions (a-d) as sub-grades to provide finer distinctions in difficulty. Successfully climbing a 5.9 is often considered a significant milestone for many climbers. Reaching grades 5.10 is a common goal.

5.11a – 5.11d routes involve prevalent smaller holds, such as challenging crimps and poor slopers, with infrequent opportunities for restful stances, often on vertical to notably overhanging terrain. The climbing at this level is consistently technical, involving sustained sequences of difficult moves, powerful individual moves, and complex body positioning. Progressing into and through the 5.11 range typically requires dedicated practice and specific training, including strength-building workouts, to build requisite strength (particularly finger and core strength) and endurance. Many accomplished climbers operate comfortably in this range. A useful “guide to yosemite decimal system” can provide additional context for these number grades.

The Climber’s Toolkit: Engaging with Grades Intelligently

Developing effective strategies for interacting with grades can significantly enhance a climber’s journey. This involves improving the ability to ‘read’ a route effectively, using grades as a constructive tool for personal development and goal setting, emphasizing the overall experience beyond just chasing numerical achievements, and learning how to provide valuable, constructive feedback to local gyms and their setters. This helps make for a more enjoyable climbing experience.

Reading Routes and Understanding Setter Intent

Effective route reading from the ground is a foundational skill. It involves visually inspecting hold types, their orientation, the wall angle, potential crux sequences, and possible rest positions before even stepping onto the climb. If you become familiar with the setters at your local gym, recognizing their individual styles—for example, whether they tend to set more dynamic, technical, or powerful routes—can offer valuable insights, though this recognition typically develops over time with experience for the avid climber.

Observing other climbers attempt a route (“beta”) can be valuable, but developing personal problem-solving skills is crucial, as beta is often dependent on an individual’s body type or preferred climbing style. Focus on how your body will need to be positioned to use the holds effectively, considering balance, momentum, and the overall flow of movement, with footwork being a key element in your planning. Embrace the inherent subjectivity of grades; view them as suggestions or starting points rather than absolute, definitive truths. An informed climber understands that their personal experience of a grade will always be unique and uses the grade primarily to gauge if a climb presents an appropriate level of challenge for them at that moment. UKClimbing Forums have discussions on “learning to read routes.”

Using Grades for Goal Setting and Progress Measurement

Grades are a valuable tool when you Set Specific Goals for your climbing. They allow you to create specific, meaningful, and achievable targets, such as consistently climbing a certain grade level or mastering the types of movements typically found at a particular target grade. Tracking progress by the grades climbed can be highly motivating for many individuals. However, it’s wise to be mindful of potential inconsistencies in grading between different gyms or even between route resets within the same gym, especially if you’re regularly climbing.

Progress in climbing isn’t always linear; it’s beneficial to focus on improvements in technique, strength, and your mental game alongside the achievement of higher grades. Use grades to select climbs that are challenging yet attainable. Constantly climbing routes that are too easy won’t foster significant growth, while always attempting routes far too hard can lead to frustration or even injury. Finding climbs that appropriately push your personal limits can often lead to the enjoyable and highly focused “flow state,” where challenge and ability are perfectly matched. Philadelphia Rock Gyms offer tips to “set climbing goals that match grades.”

Focusing on Movement and Experience Over Chasing Numbers

While grades certainly offer a useful structure for gauging difficulty, the true richness of climbing is found in the experience itself. This includes the joy of skill development, the satisfaction of solving diverse movement puzzles, and mastering movement and footwork over mere grip strength. Prioritize developing a broad range of climbing skills and genuinely enjoying the process of learning and continuous improvement on various different climbs.

Adopting a mindset that values personal challenge over the external validation provided by a grade number is crucial for long-term engagement. If a particular climb feels hard to you, view it as an opportunity to identify and address a potential weakness in your technique or strength, regardless of the numerical grade attached to it. Seeking variety by climbing different styles of routes, even if they are at lower grades than one’s maximum ability, is often more beneficial for overall development than repeatedly climbing a single style at a higher grade, as it builds a more well-rounded skillset. A Reddit discussion titled “discussion do soft grades get you stronger” explores related concepts.

Providing Constructive Feedback to Gyms and Setters

Climber feedback can be a valuable resource for route setters and gym management, and indeed, many climbing gyms actively solicit it from their members. When providing feedback, especially concerning route grades, aim to be specific, polite, and constructive in your comments. This helps ensure your input is actionable and well-received.

Instead of merely stating that a route is “soft” or “sandbagged,” try to explain why it felt that way to you. Reference specific moves, hold types, or sequences, perhaps comparing them to other established climbs in the same gym to provide context for your assessment of the whole climb. Utilize the gym’s preferred channels for submitting feedback, whether that’s a physical comment board, a suggestion box, integrated features in apps like KAYA, or by speaking directly and respectfully to gym staff or setters. Understand that setters are tasked with catering to a wide range of climbers and strive to achieve a consensus grade, making it impossible to perfectly please every individual on every route. Constructive feedback is part of an ongoing dialogue that helps refine setting over time. There are forum discussions like “how do wall setters grade their routes” where climbers share perspectives.

Conclusion: The Evolving Dialogue of Gym Grades

The process of establishing a gym climbing grade is a complex blend of artistry, scientific understanding, physical effort, subjective judgment, and collaborative teamwork, far from a rigid, unyielding formula. The “setter’s secret,” if there is one, truly lies in this dynamic interplay of diverse factors. This process is constantly evolving, influenced by new hold designs, shifting setting philosophies, valuable climber feedback, and the ongoing progress of the wider climbing community.

Understanding how grades emerge should foster a genuine appreciation for the skill, dedication, and passion that route setters bring to their craft. It encourages us as climbers to view grades as valuable, albeit imperfect, tools for guidance and for measuring our personal progress. The true value is in using this knowledge to engage with our climbing more intelligently, focusing on the richness of movement and experience, and ultimately finding joy and growth on the wall. Grades are essentially a conversation between the setter’s vision for a climb and the climber’s unique experience on it; learning to interpret this language fluently enhances not only our individual climbing journey but also the vibrant culture within our gyms.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. We also participate in other affiliate programs. The information provided on this website is provided for entertainment purposes only. We make no representations or warranties of any kind, expressed or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, adequacy, legality, usefulness, reliability, suitability, or availability of the information, or about anything else. Any reliance you place on the information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Additional terms are found in the terms of service.